One More

Photo Editing

Jordan Tate

This particular artist is an Assistant Professor of Art at the University of Cincinnati. He has a Bachelor of Philosophy in Interdisciplinary Studies from Miami University and a Master of Fine Arts in Photography from Indiana University. His artwork can be found in the Museum of Contemporary Photography and the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston. In addition to digital art, he is a writer and published “The Contemporary Dictionary of Sexual Euphemisms.” As well, he founded the contemporary art blog http://ilikethisart.net. It is not uncommon for Jordan to collaborate with artist Adam Tindale to create joint works. Tindale is "an electronic drummer and digital instrument designer." "Adam performs on his EDrumset: a new electronic instrument that utilizes physical modeling and machine learning with an intuitive physical interface." Tindale is a Permanent Instructor of Interaction Design in the Media Arts and Digital Technologies area at the Alberta College of Art and Design. 

This video is one of Jordan and Adam's works. It is called Lossless_23. This type of video is called a 3D stereographic, which is the result of is the result of the "sorting process where pixels were sorted by hue." I am not quite sure what exactly the artists are trying to say, or if they are trying to say anything at all. The only thing I could possibly see the work meaning would be something along the lines of how beauty is fleeting and that eventually it will start to sort of be eaten away. I think the work is interesting but it seems a bit too simplistic for me. 

This work is called New Work #90. It is a video of a bust floating above the ocean. This is Tate's statement about New Work: 

New Work is an exploration of visual language and process. In a sense it is an examination of how we see, what we see, what merits being seen, and how images function in contemporary visual culture. The photographic image is still often viewed as a mechanical reproduction of reality. In this paradigm, the photograph functions not as an object, but as a conceptually transparent representation of a reproduced reality rather than an object loaded with historical and functional contexts. New Work represents a shift away from the context of photograph as mechanical reproduction and is an acknowledgement of the image-maker as the mediator of sight, as well as an exploration of process and practice in contemporary image viewing and production. These images are a continuation of ongoing research / meta-photographic critique concerning the visual and conceptual processes of image comprehension.

After reading this I found the work much more intriguing. When I first watched the video I thought to myself, ok this is neat but I really don't understand the significance of it. It is interesting that these works are in a way an experiment or a test to see how we comprehend what we see. 

New Work #50

This is another New Work project that also is a bit visually confusing.

All of my information was found by navigating through Jordan Tate's profile found at this address rhizome

Collage

Jochem Hendricks

Jochem Hendricks creates "eye drawings," or in his native German, "Augenzeichnungen." It is funny that though called "drawings" the artist's hand never picks up a pencil or even moves. Rather, the drawing is done with the eyes along with the assistance of technology. "Human eye movements are traced and digitized during the visual process of looking at something" and then are printed later. The final products are never simply a tracing of a 2D or 3D object, and the subjects are never trivial. Hendricks has done eye drawings of hands, time, reading, writing, drawing, and light. The subjects he choses "circle around issues of research and the visualization of abstract motives and processes." 

Time

This is one of Hendricks' eye drawings titled time. One meaning of the work that I initially can think of is that time is stressful and a great concern. The jagged and spastic patterns that the lines are going in indicate to me this level of stress. Also, the darkness created by the overlapping of the lines indicates that certain patterns we traced over and over during the drawing which means that the eye was moving very quickly in a concerning way. It is also interesting that the drawing is in a circular shape. I do not know if this was a drawing done by looking at a circular wall clock. If that was the case then that could explain the circular shape. If this is not the case then it is interesting to think of time in the shape of a circle. We tend to envision time as a straight line that ultimately leads to an end. It is interesting to think of time as a circle because many times in life you repeat stages that you have already been through years before.  

I think what could be improved within the work would be to possibly have some sort of comparison where there are multiple eye drawings done by various people from various economic, racial, or cultural backgrounds so that we can see if people from different backgrounds view things such as time or art in different ways than we do. I do also take issue in that all of the drawings are done with black ink. Colors can also be associated with different "abstract processes" so I think it could be interesting to somehow incorporate that into the eye drawings.    

All information from: Jochem Hendricks Website